Employer Responsibilities in Accommodation and Dismissal: A Legal Perspective
When it comes to managing employee performance and supporting staff with disabilities, employers must carefully balance their legal responsibilities. The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal’s decision in Karim v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board offers a real-world example of how these issues can play out in the workplace — and what employers and employees alike can learn from them.
Overview of the Case: Disability Accommodation vs. Termination of Employment
In this case, the employee, a Senior Associate in Corporate Compliance, was terminated during their six-month probationary period. They alleged discrimination due to disability after being dismissed.
Starting work on July 15, 2019, the employee soon faced issues related to performance and absenteeism. By September, concerns were raised by the employer. Shortly afterward, the employee sought accommodations for mental and physical health concerns. These included requests for additional paid leave and occasional remote work — but the employee did not provide clear details on how often or for how long these accommodations would be needed.
The employer referred the case to its internal Healthy Workplace Centre, which then involved an external medical consultant to assess the accommodation request. The medical review did not support the request to work from home or justify the frequent absences. Based on this assessment and ongoing performance issues, the employer ended the employment on December 12, 2019.
Human Rights Tribunal’s Ruling: No Discrimination Found
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario dismissed the complaint. While the employee did present evidence of a disability, the Tribunal determined it wasn’t enough to prove that the disability directly caused the performance issues or led to their dismissal.
The ruling stressed that employers have a legal obligation — known as the duty to accommodate up to the point of undue hardship — to investigate and respond to requests for workplace adjustments. However, this process is a shared responsibility. Employees must also participate actively and communicate their needs clearly.
In this instance, the Tribunal found that the employer met its duty by consulting its Healthy Workplace Centre and obtaining an impartial medical review. The employee, on the other hand, had not cooperated fully in explaining what accommodations were needed or why.
The termination was attributed to ongoing documented performance concerns and absences — not to the employee’s disability. The decision to dismiss had already been made and coincided with the end of the probation period, which the Tribunal found to be reasonable.
Key Legal Insights for Employers and Employees
1. Accommodation Requires Collaboration
Employers must be proactive in addressing requests for support related to disability, but employees must also provide clear, consistent information. Involving HR departments or third-party professionals (like a disability specialist) can help both sides meet legal requirements.
If you’re unsure about how to navigate this process, speaking with an employment contract review lawyer can help clarify your rights and obligations.
2. Probation Periods Are Crucial
The case reinforces how important it is for employers to use probationary periods effectively — setting expectations, monitoring performance, and addressing concerns promptly. Probation doesn’t eliminate an employer’s responsibility under the Human Rights Code, but it does allow for early performance-based decisions if no discrimination is involved.
If you’ve been dismissed during your probation and believe your rights were violated, a wrongful dismissal lawyer or constructive dismissal lawyer can help evaluate your case.
3. Document Performance Thoroughly
Whether you’re managing employees or protecting yourself as a worker, maintaining clear documentation is essential. Performance reviews, email records, and notes from meetings all serve as important evidence in legal disputes. For employers, these documents demonstrate fair treatment. For employees, they provide a record of attempts to comply with expectations or request help.
4. Medical Evidence Can Make or Break an Accommodation Request
This case highlights that while initial medical proof isn’t always needed to start the accommodation process, employers have the right to request further medical information. When an employee fails to back up a request or doesn’t participate in the process, it can weaken their legal position.
Getting guidance from a Toronto employment lawyer early in the process can make a significant difference in ensuring proper accommodation is granted — or appropriately requested.
5. Severance and Legal Support
Though this case involved a probationary employee (who may not be entitled to severance), those dismissed outside probation could be eligible for severance compensation. If you are in that situation, it is crucial to negotiate your severance package with help from a qualified employment lawyer to ensure you receive fair treatment.
Final Thoughts: Know Your Rights and Duties
The Karim decision offers a valuable reminder of the responsibilities that employers and employees share in accommodation situations. Employers must engage in the process seriously, thoroughly document performance concerns, and avoid making decisions based on assumptions about disability.
For employees, open communication and cooperation are critical when requesting accommodations. If your job is at risk — or if you have been dismissed — consulting with a Toronto employment lawyer can help protect your rights.
Ultimately, the decision of Karim v Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2024 HRTO 1231 (CanLII) serves as an important reminder that even if an Applicant has a disability and has suffered an adverse impact, this does not make out a case of discrimination unless there is evidence that the disability was a factor in the adverse impact.
Call Toronto Employment Lawyer Now
It is important for an employee (or an employee) to obtain a legal consultation before taking any action that could affect the situation at workplace. Sezar has experience advocating for both employers and employees, which allows him to anticipate the other side’s arguments and develop an effective strategy, including dealing with workplace human rights disputes.
If you are looking for a wrongful dismissal lawyer in Toronto, call us today at 647-822-5492 for a case evaluation with an experienced employment lawyer.
Disclaimer: The content on this website and blog is not legal advice or legal opinion of any kind, and is only to provide general information. It is in no way particular to your individual case and should not be relied upon in any way. The outcome of a legal matter depends on its unique circumstances, and prior successes are not indicative of future results. No portion or use of this website or blog will establish a lawyer-client relationship with the author, this law firm or any related party. Should you require legal advice for your particular situation, please fill out the form below, or call 647-822-5492, to request an initial consultation.
